This was sent to me right before the election last November. I posted it on My$pace back then, and am re-posting it now just because... I don't need a reason! You're not the boss of me!
His words begin with a >. Mine follow.
His letter begins:
> I am ready to start building a wall.
What, like the Iron Curtain? It will be a wall to keep you peasants in, not free people out.
> Dear Red States:
>If you manage to steal this election, too, we've decided we're leaving. We
>intend to form our own country and we are taking the other Blue States with
>us. In case you aren't aware, this includes California, Hawaii, Oregon,
>Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and the entire
>Northeast. We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation and,
>especially, to the people of the new country of New California.
I emphatically support your decision to form your own country, however, WHERE you are able to do it is not up to you. How do you intend to "take" other blue states with you? How can you believe you can "Take" anything when you all have given up on the Second Amendment and have no weapons or the skills to use them? And just because all of Californias 55 electoral votes will go to the winner of the popular vote, probably Obama, does not mean all of California supports Obama or any of his crazy leftist ideas. I estimate a full 45% of California voters will support McCain. What are you going to do with them? Kill them, like Ayers and his buddies wanted to do? Bring it on...Unlike you, we *have* guns, and we know how to use them, and using them in that manner will be EXACTLY what the Founding Fathers had in mind.
> To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the former slave
>States. We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get the Statue
>of Liberty. You get Dollywood.
You have stem cell research now. What you don't have is tax-payer funded EMBRYONIC stem cell research. If there was ANY hope of embryonic stem cells having scientific benefits the free market would be all over it. As it is, it is a dead end and most researchers have moved on to more-hopeful umbilical, nasal, adult, etc. stem cell research. The only reason to spend taxpayer money on embryonic stem cell research is so you can de-sensitize Americans about harvesting human embryos, fertilized zygotes, and therefore HUMAN BEINGS! And what good will the Statue of Liberty do for a society that has eradicated individual Liberty? You'll just have to melt it down so no-one gets reminded how good they had it before they tried to vote themselves into prosperity.
> We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
What makes you think these businesses will stay in your communist Utopia? Bill Gates wants a country that has one foot in capitalism and one foot in socialism. He would chooses capitalism every time, if he had to choose one or the other. So would 99% of other businesses.
> We get Harvard. You get Ol' Miss.
You can have Harvard...Nobody learns anything of value there anyway.
> We get 85% of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get Alabama.
Again...venture capital will abandon you so fast the giant sucking sound will blow out your incense.
> We get two-thirds of the tax revenue. You get to make the Red States pay their fair share.
What tax revenue? No-one will be working.
Who would bother what with all the free health care, student tuition, government cheese, and tax credits you are promising them?
> Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22% lower than the Christian
>Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of single moms.
Huh? Source, please?
> Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and anti-war.
>We're going to want all of our citizens back from Iraq, at once. If you need
>people to fight, ask your Evangelicals. They have kids they're apparently
>willing to send to their deaths for no purpose and they don't care if you don't
>show pictures of their children's caskets coming home. We do wish you
>success in Iraq and hope that the WMDs turn up. We're not willing to spend
>our resources in Bush's quagmire.
Good luck keeping all those Mexicans/Guatemalans/Nicaraguans/etc. happy. They will take California from you faster than you can say AZTLAN.
> With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80% of the
>country's fresh water, more than 90% of the pineapple and lettuce, 92% of
>the nation's fresh fruit, 95% of America's quality wines, 90% of all cheese,
>90% of the high tech industry, 95% of the corn and soybean crop (thanks Iowa!),
> most of the U.S low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and
>condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Stanford, Cal, UCLA, Cal
>Tech and MIT.
What good will all that be for you unless you start FORCING PEOPLE to harvest it all.
Do you think your new Socialist Utopian government will allow you all to just hang out at coffee bars and be students-for-life and such? You will be put to work. Just like in Russia, Cuba, and China. Harvesting food, shoveling shit, making Soylent Green, etc.
> With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88% of
>all obese Americans (and their projected health care costs), 92% of all U.S.
>mosquitoes, nearly 100% of the tornadoes, 90% of the hurricanes, 99% of
>all Southern Baptists, virtually 100% of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh,
>Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
Blah, blah, blah...
>We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.
You can have Hollywood. Yosemite will burn down because you won't allow reasonable forest management in your "pristine" environment.
> Additionally, 38% of those in the Red States believe Jonah was actually
>swallowed by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred, unless we're discussing
>the war, the death penalty or gun laws, 44% say that evolution is only a
>theory, 53% that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61% of you crazy
>bastards believe you are people with higher morals than us Lefties.
Blah, blah,blah, evolution *is* a theory, The war was declared on "terror" not on the perpetrators of 911, blah, blah, with no foundation for the idea of morality, it's just a word, and as such able to be re-defined to mean whatever you want it to mean. Which is to say, without belief in god, there can be no morality.
> Finally, we're taking the good pot, too. You can have that dirt weed they
>grow in Mexico.
I'll grow my own.
> Go to hell you inbred fearmongers,
> The blue states
First of all, you don't believe in hell. Secondly, if there is a hell, I don't want you to go there. Just leave me alone. Again, why the hostility? Why the vengefulness? Why does my desire to have the government be less intrusive cause you soooooooooo much anxiety? I want you to be able to pursue your own happiness as lax or rugged as you desire. You want me to go to hell because I don't want you to take my money (taxes) to pay for your hare-brained schemes. Where's the hate? On your side...
Note all the work that you people do to try to measure who gets what.
Why are Liberals always so concerned with who gets what? Could it be because their entire philosophy is based on envy? The idea of parting company has been brought up many times, beginning with Ayn Rand back in the 1950's. Freestateproject. org is in the process of doing this right now in New Hampshire. The difference is, NO ONE at the free state project has spent one second talking about "hahah, look at what we got and look at what you got!" We just want to be left alone. That's it. No envy, no jealousy, no vindictiveness, no venegence.
Now, I know this was probably some sort of attempt to bring levity at the last minute, but for humor to work, there must be an element of truth; every comedian will tell you this. All this does is illustrate how badly thought-out liberalism is as a whole. It's bat-shit crazy at best and downright evil at it's worst.
And now I'm even madder because it's forcing me to do something I said I wouldn't do: Vote for John McCain as the lesser of two evils.
Steve Casas
--
He who would give up essential Liberty for temporary Security deserves neither.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
